|
|
|
|
|
| Professor's
Reply: |
Correct!
|
| |
|
While the Court concludes that there is usually no
entitlement to affirmative state protection, it holds that
the Equal Protection Clause prohibits states from
selectively denying its protective services to certain
disfavored minorities. Thus, if the state decided to
withdraw protection from Joshua because of he was a
member of an oppressed racial group, then this decision
would likely violate the constitution--specifically, the Equal
Protection Clause found in Section One of the Fourteenth
Amendment.
|
|
|
|
|
 Go Back to Question 5 or Go to Question
6 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
