|
|
|
|
|
| Professor's
Reply: |
Incorrect!
|
| |
|
Justice Brennan's dissent does not say that mere knowledge
of abuse alone would create a duty to protect. Instead,
Brennan focuses on the actual actions taken by the state
itself. Go back and read Brennan's dissenting opinion and
see what acts the state engaged in that Brennan deems
important in conferring a duty upon the state to protect
Joshua from his father's abuse.
|
|
|
|
|
 Go Back to Question 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
