|
| Professor's
Reply: |
Correct!
|
| |
|
Correct. Joshua argued that a "special relationship" existed
because the state knew he was in danger of abuse from his
father and that the state had become involved, by words
and action, in protecting him from such abuse. Joshua
argued that the state, through its extensive, voluntary
actions, acquired an affirmative constitutional duty to
protect him from abuse in a reasonably competent manner.
|
|
|
|
|
 Go Back to Question 2 or
Go to Question 3
|
