|
MAXIMIZING THE WEALTH OF FICTIONAL SHAREHOLDERS: WHICH FICTION SHOULD DIRECTORS EMBRACE?, 32 Journal of Corporation Law 381-427 (2007).
VALUATION IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: CHOOSING BETWEEN OFFER PRICES AND ASKING PRICES AS THE APPROPRIATE MEASURE OF WILLINGNESS TO PAY, 39 John Marshall Law Review 429-473 (2006).
STANDARDS OF CONDUCT AND STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN CORPORATE LAW: THE NEED FOR CLOSER ALIGNMENT, 82 Nebraska Law Review 671-692 (2004).
THE INFLUENCE OF TWO DECADES OF CONTRACT LAW SCHOLARSHIP ON JUDICIAL RULINGS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS, 57 SMU Law Review 105-136 (2004).
REDEFINING THE FIDUCIARY DUTIES OF CORPORATE DIRECTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEAM PRODUCTION MODEL OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, 36 Creighton Law Review 623-642 (2003).
RETHINKING CORPORATE FIDUCIARY DUTIES: THE INEFFICIENCY OF THE SHAREHOLDER PRIMACY NORM, 55 SMU Law Review 141-156 (2002).
SELLING STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS: THE UNCERTAIN EFFECT OF ANTI-ASSIGNMENT CLAUSES, 28 Pepperdine Law Review 787-817 (2001).
THE ENFORCIBILITY OF FIXED-TERM EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS THAT CONFLICT WITH CORPORATE BYLAWS, 36 Tulane Law Journal 583-590 (2001).
THE INFLUENCE OF A DECADE OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION SCHOLARSHIP ON JUDICIAL RULINGS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS, 53 SMU Law Review 9-30 (2000).
EXPLORING THE COMPLICATIONIST GAMBIT: AN AUSTRIAN APPROACH TO THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW, 73 Notre Dame Law Review 316-384 (1998).
|